Reported that polluted water from CDM's settling pond affected populated areas in Lubumbashi and Annexe, with concerns about chemical and metallic contaminants.
Read report ↗A 20 August 2026 AMAP field update documents continuing road and drainage works linking Kassapa, Kamatete and Kamisepe. The new evidence shows infrastructure work progressing, while questions about full environmental clean-up, soil and water testing, monitoring and remedy remain open.
This updates the existing CDM pollution case; it is not a new incident.
The underlying pollution, clean-up and remedy questions remain unresolved.
The report is dated 20 August 2026 and documents road/drainage works.
The supplied field material visibly records active rehabilitation works.
No complete independent post-incident soil/water test results are supplied with this update.
The underlying case concerns polluted water and possible soil/groundwater impacts. The 20 August update shows road grading and drainage construction, but does not show that environmental clean-up and testing are complete.
The road works affect everyday access for Kassapa, Kamatete and Kamisepe. Earlier case records also raise concerns about homes, water, health and livelihoods that remain relevant to follow-up.
Road rehabilitation is visible. AMAP still needs clear records on environmental clean-up, post-incident soil/water testing, monitoring, regulatory compliance, assistance and compensation.
French is the original field report text. English and Portuguese are accessibility translations and do not replace the source document.
Retention-basin failure and polluted-water release reported in Kassapa, Kamatete and Kamisepe.
Public reporting records official confirmation and suspension of CDM activities.
A judicial investigation into the basin failure was publicly reported.
Public reporting said victim support, environmental measures and an indemnification process were underway.
Public reporting described rehabilitation on the Kasapa / CDM / Marché Moïse road axis.
New report, photograph and video document continued asphalt and drainage works.
The supplied report, photograph and video document road and drainage works progressing on 20 August 2026.
The report itself refers back to the earlier CDM road rehabilitation update and the same three communities.
This new material does not provide complete independent post-incident soil and water results or proof that all remediation obligations are finished.
AMAP tracks whether the relevant company and public authorities have been notified, whether they respond, and what action follows. Contact details used for notification are retained internally and are not published on this page.
The underlying incident concerns polluted water and possible impacts on water sources and groundwater.
The original incident involved a retention system holding industrial/mining effluent; waste and effluent management remain relevant to prevention and remediation.
The case concerns impacts on homes, fields, roads, market access, water use and community remedy.
This connects mining-specific environmental and community impacts with company accountability and disclosure.

Two-page field update documenting progress on asphalt and drainage works. This is follow-up evidence within DRC Case 001; it does not establish that environmental clean-up is complete.
Open full original report ↗Company representatives, public authorities, affected communities and other stakeholders may respond, correct or update the record on DRC Case 001. Responses submitted below are published directly on this page, unless they break AMAP’s publication rules — insults and abuse, sexual or pornographic material, threats, unproven defamatory allegations, or advertising and spam. Flagged submissions are kept and referred to AMAP for review instead of being published.
Publication and privacy: personal email addresses and contact details are never displayed publicly. Publication does not mean that AMAP has verified, adopted or endorsed the response.
Responses submitted above are published here once they pass AMAP’s publication rules. Published responses represent the respondent’s position and are not automatically verified or endorsed by AMAP.